When your business operates at 35,000 feet, the stakes are extremely high, and so is the complexity of the contracts that support these operations. From the busy hangars at Houston's David Wayne Hooks Memorial Airport to the corporate jets departing from Dallas Love Field, Texas aviation businesses rely on comprehensive contracts to maintain safe and profitable operations.
Whether you're a manufacturer supplying components to Boeing's facility in San Antonio or an FBO providing services at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport, aviation contracts form the foundation of your business relationships. These agreements govern everything from multi-million-dollar aircraft leases to specialized maintenance services, and contract errors can halt your operations immediately.
Aviation contracts operate in a unique regulatory environment where federal aviation regulations intersect with state business law. In Texas, these agreements must comply with both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements and the Texas Business Organizations Code. The high-value nature of aviation assets, where a single aircraft can cost tens of millions of dollars, means that contract disputes can result in devastating financial consequences.
The aviation industry's reliance on safety, precision, and regulatory compliance creates contract requirements that simply don't exist in other industries. When a maintenance contract covers work that could affect flight safety, or when a supplier agreement involves FAA-certified parts, the legal implications extend far beyond typical business relationships.
Texas hosts major aviation manufacturing operations, including Bell Flight in Fort Worth, Boeing facilities in San Antonio, and numerous component manufacturers throughout the state. These manufacturers depend on complex supply chains governed by detailed vendor agreements that address everything from quality control standards to delivery schedules.
Aviation manufacturing contracts must account for the unique requirements of producing FAA-certified components. Suppliers must maintain specific certifications, follow detailed quality control procedures, and provide comprehensive documentation for every part they deliver. These contracts typically include:
Aviation manufacturing contracts require sophisticated risk allocation provisions. Under Texas law, parties can contractually allocate certain risks, but some liabilities, particularly those related to product defects that could affect flight safety, may not be fully transferable.
The Texas Business Organizations Code, specifically Chapter 21 regarding corporations, provides the framework for how manufacturing companies can structure their supplier relationships. These statutory provisions become particularly important when manufacturers need to pierce corporate veils or pursue remedies against suppliers who fail to meet their obligations.
Texas airports, from major hubs like Dallas/Fort Worth International to smaller general aviation facilities, rely on numerous vendor relationships to maintain operations. DFW International Airport is owned by the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas ("owner cities"). DFW International Airport is a Public Entity and must follow applicable Federal and State Law when buying goods and services.
Many Texas airports operate as public entities, which means their vendor contracts must comply with public procurement laws. To improve predictability in the customer experience by adding a comprehensive value to the procurement process. To provide an inclusive, integrated and respectful Procurement & Material Management solution. These requirements add layers of complexity to what might otherwise be straightforward commercial relationships.
Public airports must follow competitive bidding processes for many contracts, maintain transparency in their vendor selection, and ensure compliance with federal grant requirements. The Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funding that many Texas airports receive comes with specific procurement requirements that must be incorporated into vendor contracts.
Airports contract with numerous service providers, from food service vendors and retail operators to ground handling companies and fuel suppliers. These contracts must address:
In response to requests from airport owners and operators for guidance in ensuring fair and transparent pricing and access for general aviation pilots, AOPA has developed a set of recommendations for airports to consider when preparing requests for proposals (RFPs) from fixed-base operators wanting to operate there.
FBO contracts are among the most complex airport vendor agreements. These long-term leases typically span 20-30 years and grant FBOs exclusive or semi-exclusive rights to provide services like fuel sales, aircraft handling, and hangar rentals. In Texas, these agreements must balance the airport's need for reliable service providers with regulatory requirements for reasonable access and pricing.
The terms of FBO agreements often determine the cost structure for general aviation users throughout the lease term. As such, these contracts require careful attention to pricing mechanisms, service standards, and renewal terms.
Aircraft leasing represents one of the most significant contract categories in aviation, with transactions often involving millions of dollars and complex operational considerations. With purchase prices for general aviation aircraft often reaching into the seven- and eight-figure range, the potential sales tax liability can be significant.
The aircraft leasing market offers several distinct lease structures, each with unique legal and tax implications under Texas law.
Texas law allows buyers of certain tangible personal property to avoid paying sales tax on the purchase, if the sale is for resale. This exemption covers purchases made for the purpose of leasing. This creates significant planning opportunities for aircraft leasing arrangements.
Recent changes to Texas law have made it easier for aircraft purchasers to structure transactions as lease arrangements to defer sales tax liability. By creating an entity that will purchase the aircraft with the sole intent of leasing it out to others (such as the entity's owner), the sales tax liability can be shifted from the initial purchase to an incremental sales tax owed on the fair market value of the hourly flight costs, as they occur in the future.
Aircraft lease agreements must carefully address operational control, which determines which party has responsibility for flight operations and regulatory compliance. Without limiting the foregoing and notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, at all times during any Commercial Operation, the Parties hereby agree that Manager shall:
(i) have possession, control and command of the Aircraft;
(ii) have the sole and absolute exercise of authority over initiating, conducting or terminating any flight of the Aircraft.
The party with operational control bears primary responsibility for ensuring FAA compliance, maintaining insurance, and making operational decisions. This allocation of responsibility must be clearly defined in the lease agreement to avoid regulatory violations and liability issues.
Aircraft lease agreements require sophisticated insurance provisions that protect both lessors and lessees. All-risk ground and flight physical damage and hull war and allied perils insurance (Hull Coverage) on the Aircraft for the agreed value of Eighteen Million US Dollars (US$18,000,000) (Casualty Value).
Insurance requirements typically include hull coverage for the aircraft's value, liability coverage for third parties, and specific coverage for various operational scenarios. The allocation of insurance costs and responsibilities can significantly impact the economics of the lease arrangement.
Aircraft maintenance contracts operate under some of the most stringent regulatory requirements in commercial aviation. Each certificate holder who contracts for maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations must ensure that its system for the continuing analysis and surveillance of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations carried out by a maintenance provider, as required by § 135.431(a), contains procedures for oversight of all contracted covered work.
The FAA heavily regulates contracted aircraft maintenance through 14 CFR Parts 43, 121, and 135. The FAA is amending Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) §§ 121.368, 121.369, 135.426, and 135.427. These amendments apply to certificate holders who conduct domestic, flag, or supplemental operations under part 121, and to certificate holders who conduct commuter operations or on-demand operations.
These regulations require that aircraft operators maintain direct oversight of all maintenance work, even when performed by third-party contractors. The concept of "covered work" includes maintenance tasks that could affect flight safety if performed improperly.
Recent FAA interpretations have clarified supervision requirements for maintenance work. The regulations allow for anyone to perform maintenance on an aircraft (excluding inspections), so long as they are supervised by someone certificated to perform the task being accomplished.
However, the FAA's position on what constitutes adequate supervision has evolved. A new FAA interpretation of "supervision" upends decades of maintenance oversight practices in general aviation. This creates additional compliance challenges for maintenance contracts, particularly those involving training or owner-assisted maintenance.
Aircraft maintenance contracts must specify the qualifications required for maintenance providers and their employees. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) drug and alcohol testing regulation, 14 CFR part 120, requires an air carrier to ensure that any individual who performs safety-sensitive duties (e.g., maintenance or preventive maintenance) directly or by contract, including subcontract at any tier, is subject to testing under its FAA-mandated drug and alcohol testing program.
This means that maintenance contracts must address not only the technical qualifications of maintenance personnel but also their compliance with drug and alcohol testing requirements. Contractors must implement comprehensive testing programs or ensure their subcontractors participate in the aircraft operator's testing program.
Maintenance contracts require specific performance standards that address both regulatory compliance and operational needs. These agreements typically include:
Aircraft maintenance generates extensive documentation requirements that must be addressed in maintenance contracts. Providers must maintain detailed records of all work performed, parts installed, and personnel qualifications. These records become part of the aircraft's permanent maintenance history and are crucial for both regulatory compliance and aircraft value preservation.
Maintenance contracts must specify how these records will be maintained, who has access to them, and what happens to the documentation when the maintenance relationship ends. Electronic record-keeping systems have become standard, but contracts must address data security, backup procedures, and format compatibility.
Regardless of the specific type of aviation contract, certain provisions appear consistently across the industry due to the unique characteristics of aviation business.
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of force majeure provisions in aviation contracts. Due to financial losses suffered by the airline industry, airline industries are looking for a potential respite to survive and avoid liability for default on their leases.
Traditional force majeure clauses may not provide adequate protection for aviation businesses facing pandemic-related restrictions. Many aviation contracts now include specific provisions addressing government-ordered flight restrictions, border closures, and health emergencies.
Aviation contracts routinely include comprehensive regulatory compliance provisions that address both current and future regulatory changes. These clauses typically require all parties to maintain necessary licenses and certifications, comply with applicable safety regulations, and adapt to regulatory changes as they occur.
Given the high-value nature of aviation assets and the safety-critical nature of aviation services, termination and default provisions require careful consideration. The term Event of Default means:
(i) non-payment by a party of any Rent and/or any other amount due pursuant to this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice from the other party of failure to pay.
Aviation contracts often include accelerated termination rights for safety-related violations, loss of regulatory certifications, or failure to maintain required insurance coverage.
The complexity of aviation contracts, combined with the significant financial and safety implications of getting them wrong, makes it essential to work with attorneys who have deep experience in both aviation law and Texas business law.
Aviation contracts require an understanding of federal aviation regulations, state business law, tax implications, and industry practices. The intersection of these different legal areas means that general business attorneys may miss critical issues that could expose their clients to significant liability or regulatory violations.
When evaluating aviation contracts, experienced counsel will address not only the obvious commercial terms but also the regulatory compliance requirements, insurance adequacy, and risk allocation provisions that can make the difference between a successful business relationship and a costly dispute.
Aviation contracts in Texas operate at the intersection of federal aviation regulations and state business law, creating unique challenges that require specialized knowledge and careful attention to detail. Whether you're dealing with manufacturer supplier agreements, airport vendor contracts, aircraft leases, or maintenance agreements, these contracts must address not only commercial considerations but also safety requirements, regulatory compliance, and the high-stakes nature of aviation operations.
The regulatory environment continues to evolve, with new FAA interpretations and changing state law requirements affecting contract terms and enforcement. Recent developments in areas like maintenance supervision requirements and sales tax treatment of aircraft leases demonstrate the importance of staying current with both regulatory and legal changes.
Successful aviation businesses in Texas recognize that their contracts form the foundation of their operations. By working with experienced aviation counsel and addressing the unique requirements of the industry, companies can structure agreements that protect their interests while enabling them to focus on their core operations,maintaining safe and profitable aviation businesses.
Q: Do aviation contracts need to comply with both federal and state law?
A: Yes, aviation contracts must comply with both federal aviation regulations (such as FAA requirements) and applicable state business law. In Texas, this includes compliance with the Texas Business Organizations Code and other relevant state statutes. The dual regulatory framework creates additional complexity that requires careful legal analysis.
Q: What happens if an aviation vendor loses their FAA certifications during a contract term?
A: Most aviation contracts include provisions for automatic termination or suspension if a party loses required FAA certifications. The specific consequences depend on the contract terms, but loss of certification typically triggers immediate termination rights for the non-defaulting party, as continued performance would likely violate federal regulations.
Q: Can aviation maintenance contracts limit liability for defective work?
A: While parties can include limitation of liability clauses, these provisions face significant restrictions in aviation maintenance contracts due to safety considerations. Courts and regulators closely scrutinize attempts to limit liability for maintenance work that could affect flight safety. Effective contracts typically focus on insurance requirements and clear performance standards rather than broad liability limitations.
Q: How do recent changes in Texas sales tax law affect aircraft leasing arrangements?
A: Recent Texas legislation has made it easier to structure aircraft purchases as lease arrangements to defer sales tax liability. Instead of paying the full sales tax at purchase, properly structured lease arrangements can spread the tax obligation over the lease payments. However, these arrangements must meet specific requirements and genuine lease characteristics to qualify for the beneficial tax treatment.
Q: What regulatory approvals are needed for aircraft maintenance contracts?
A: While maintenance contracts themselves don't require FAA approval, the maintenance providers must hold appropriate certifications (such as repair station certificates under 14 CFR Part 145). Additionally, aircraft operators must include contracted maintenance providers in their FAA-approved maintenance programs and oversight systems.
Q: How long do aviation contracts typically run?
A: Contract terms vary significantly by type. Aircraft leases often run 5-15 years, FBO agreements typically span 20-30 years, manufacturing supplier contracts may run 1-5 years with renewal options, and maintenance agreements often operate on annual terms with automatic renewals. The duration depends on the type of service, asset values involved, and industry practices.
Aviation businesses in Texas face unique legal challenges that require experienced counsel who understand both the aviation industry and the complex regulatory environment in which it operates. At Vestige Law PLLC, our Houston-based business law practice focuses on helping aviation companies structure contracts that protect their interests while ensuring compliance with all applicable federal and state requirements.
Whether you need assistance with vendor agreements, aircraft leases, maintenance contracts, or any other aviation business arrangement, our team has the experience and industry knowledge to guide you through the process. We work closely with aviation companies throughout Texas to structure agreements that support their business objectives while minimizing legal and regulatory risks.
Don't let contract issues halt your aviation business operations. Contact Vestige Law PLLC today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help your aviation business achieve success while maintaining sound legal practices. Our commitment to the aviation community goes beyond legal representation, we're your partners in ensuring that your business relationships support safe, compliant, and profitable operations.
From our offices in Houston, we serve aviation businesses throughout Texas and beyond, providing the personalized attention and industry experience that your aviation business deserves. Let us help you structure contracts that support your business growth while protecting your interests at every stage of your operations.
Copyright © 2025 Vestige Law. All Rights Reserved | Powered by Advantage Attorney Marketing & Cloud Solutions
